Thursday, May 18, 2017

Charles de Foucauld warned Christians in France about Islam and the responsibility to evangelize Muslims, but he was ignored.

La Salette Journey
Paul Anthony Melanson May 15, 2017

Yves Mamou writes:

During the cold war with the Soviet Union, they were called 'Useful Idiots'. These people were not members of the Communist Party, but they worked for, spoke in favor of and supported the ideas of Lenin and Stalin. In the 21st century, Communism is finally dead but Islamism has grown and is replacing it as a global threat.

Like Communism, Islamism -- or Islamic totalitarianism -- has been collecting its 'Useful Infidels' the same way Communism collected its Useful Idiots. There is, however, an important difference: under the Soviet Union, Useful Idiots were intellectuals. Now, Useful Infidels are politicians, and one of them may be elected president of France today. [This was written hours before the election results in France].

Emmanuel Macron, Useful Infidel, is not a supporter of terrorism or Islamism. It is worse: he does not even see the threat. In the wake of the gruesome attacks of November 13, 2015 in Paris, Macron said that French society must assume a 'share of responsibility' in the 'soil in which jihadism thrives.'

'Someone, on the pretext that he has a beard or a name we could believe is Muslim, is four times less likely to have a job than another who is non-Muslim,' he added. Coming from the direction of Syria and armed with a Kalashnikov and a belt of explosives would, according to him, be a gesture of spite from the long-term unemployed?

Macron comes close to accusing the French of being racists and 'Islamophobes'. 'We have a share of responsibility," he warned, 'because this totalitarianism feeds on the mistrust that we have allowed to settle in society.... and if tomorrow we do not take care, it will divide them even more '.

Consequently, Macron said, French society 'must change and be more open.' More open to what? To Islam, of course."

In 1912, Charles de Foucauld wrote to Marie de Bondy: “Pray also for all the Moslems of our African Empire which is now so vast.  The present time is grave for their souls as it is for France. During the eighty years that Algiers has been ours, we have been so little concerned for the salvation of the souls of Moslems that we can say we have had no concern at all.  Nor have we been concerned for governing them well or civilizing them.  They have been kept in a state of submission and that is all.  If the Christians of France fail to recognize that they have a duty to evangelize their colonies, it is a fault for which they will be called to account, and it will be the cause of masses of souls being lost who could be saved.  If France does not administer the natives of her colony better than she has done, she will lose it with the result that these people will retreat into barbarity with all hope of evangelizing them lost for a long, long while.”

And to Captain Pariel, he wrote: “In fifty years time this African Empire will be a magnificent extension of France.  But if we treat these people, not as children but as material for exploitation, the union we shall have given them will turn against us and they will throw us into the sea.”

On the eve of his martyrdom, de Foucauld issued a final warning which came in the form of a letter to the Duke of Fitzjames: “My thinking is that if the Moslems of our colonial empire are not converted, a nationalist movement will arise similar to that in Turkey.  If we are unable to make Frenchmen of these peoples, they will chase us out.  The only way for them to become French is for them to become Christian.”

Macron would disagree.  And Francis would too, see here.  And France, as a result, will continue to ignore the prophetic warnings of Charles de Foucauld as she is ripped apart by Islamic violence.

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Fatima: Bergoglio Refuses to Kneel in Front of the Blessed Sacrament 
During his Saturday visit to Fatima, (Bergoglio) did not kneel nor genuflect during the liturgies. He abstained from kneeling at the tombs of the two seers Francisco and Jacinta, in front of the statue of Our Lady, at the consecration, and during the Eucharistic adoration although a kneeler was placed in front of him.
Health issues cannot be the reason for Francis' behaviour as he kneels when washing the feet of migrants, prisoners or transvestites on Holy Thursday.

Catechism of S. Pius X
How do we fulfill the First Commandment?
We fulfill the First Commandment by the practice of internal and external worship.
What is internal worship?
Internal worship is the honor which is given to God with the faculties of the soul alone, that is with the intellect and the will.
What is external worship?
External worship is the homage that is given to God by means of outward acts and of sensible objects.
Is it not enough internally to adore God with the heart alone?
No, it is not enough internally to adore God with the heart alone; we must also adore Him externally with both soul and body, because He is the Creator and absolute Lord of both.
Can there be external worship without internal worship?
No, in no way can there be external worship without internal, because unless external worship is accompanied by internal, it is destitute of life, of merit, and of efficacy, like a body without a soul.

Bergoglio accuses the political prisoners who fought against Communism with crimes of Lesa Humanity and defends Marxist terrorists.

While in Cuba, Bergoglio refused to visit the political prisoners who opposed the Castro Regime.  In the Vatican, he has also refused to receive the wives and mothers of the political prisoners of Venezuela.  Their family members fought against the oppressive communist totalitarian system of Chaves and Maduro which has destroyed the country.  And as a Cardinal, he collaborated with Marxism condemning the Argentinians who opposed Marxist terrorism as criminals of Lesa Humanidad.  That is to say that for Bergoglio the only political prisoners for whom mercy is requested are the Marxist terrorists like the delinquent Milagro Sala.  For those who opposed the Marxist terrorism he accused them of crimes of Lesa Humanity for which it asks Revenge and the whole weight of the law. 

Bergoglio with the heretic Amoris Laetitia's Ghostwriter. 

Víctor Fernández:  “In these cases, the Pope says that the law must be applied without mitigating factors”

“Francis already spoke several times on the issues related to the dictatorship. He always insists that we should not ask for impunity and that, especially in crimes against humanity, we must apply the law without mitigating”.

Augusto Padilla(Catapulta): Victor Fernández want to apply the law without mercy to the defenders of Argentina during the 70's but never to the subversives (guerrillas) who tried to overthrow it. The subversives were supported by Cuba with the intent to turn it into a communist tyranny. 

Those who fought against Castro communism in Cuba, Venezuela and Argentina are not those "brothers in Baptism and humanity" nor belong to the "discarded" of society; the "disinherited and unhappy; those who have been robbed of the present; the excluded and abandoned to whom the future is denied; or the orphans and victims of injustice who are not allowed to have a past" of which Bergoglio speaks, but Marxist criminals such as Milagro Sala and The Marxist murderous subversives-Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. 

Bergoglio receives the Marxist-Hebe from Bonafini without her repentance and on the other hand, is not willing to receive the victims of Marxist Terrorism or the Relatives of Argentinian Political Prisoners. 

The Church teach that those who collaborate with communists are excommunicated Latae sententiae.  For years Bergoglio hid not only Marxist books in the Library of the Jesuits but hid the Marxist subversives.  He ended up using spiritual exercises as a front to cover up and to get them out of the country.  

Pope Pius XI– The Communist system, with its authors and abettors condemned
-Communism is intrinsically wrong and no one may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith– Formal prohibition to join or favor Communist Parties – latae sententiae excommunication
Pope John XXIII– No Catholic can subscribe even to moderate Socialism – opposition between Communism and Christianity is fundamental.

Saturday, May 13, 2017

The momentary Triumph of Christ’s Enemies by John Vennari

Would Anyone Regard This as Our Lady’s Triumph? 

by John Vennari 
It is astounding that many Catholics – including those who represent various Fatima Apostolates – actually propound the idea that Pope John Paul II’s 1984 consecration of the world fulfilled Our Lady’s request to consecrate Russia, even though “Russia” was not mentioned, and the bishops of the world did not participate. Even more astonishing: many Catholics have lost the sense of the Faith so severely, they fail to see that we live not in a period that in any way resembles the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Rather, we live in an age that reflects the momentary triumph of Our Lord’s enemies. 

We will take a quick look at the plans for the deChristianization of society, laid out by Freemasonry in the 19th Century, by Communism in the 1950s, and again by Communists in the United States in the early 1990s. It is clear that Satan’s plan is now in ascendance. 

“Let us popularize vice amongst the multitude…”. 

In his 1884 encyclical against Freemasonry, Humanum Genus, Pope Leo XIII warned that the Secret Societies strive to corrupt morals in society, since the man who is morally weakened will more readily come under the influence of their godless principles. 

After speaking of stage plays, books and pamphlets that are “remarkable for license” (which would be considered tame compared to today), Pope Leo warned: “For, since generally no one is accustomed to obey crafty and clever men so submissively as those whose soul is weakened and broken down by the domination of the passions, there have been in the sect of the Freemasons some who have plainly determined and proposed that, artfully and of set purpose, the multitude should be satiated with a boundless license of vice, as, when this had been done, it would easily come under their power and authority …”

1  The infamous 19th Century Masonic document The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita
2 likewise speaks of their plan to spread immorality, especially by the corruption of women. “In order to destroy Catholicism, it is necessary to commence by suppressing women … but since we cannot suppress  women, let us corrupt her.”
3 The Alta Vendita said further: “Tertullian was right in saying that the blood of the martyrs was the seed of Christians. Let us, then, not make martyrs, but let us popularize vice amongst the multitude. Let us cause them to draw it in by their five senses; to drink it in, to be saturated with it … Make vicious hearts and you will have no more Catholics … It is corruption en masse that we have undertaken.”
4 Is Communist Goals  to Subvert Us 

We see Communism announced similar aims. In 1958, former FBI agent Leon Skousen documented 45 Communist goals to subvert America from within. They are detailed in his book, The Naked Communist. 
Here are five of these goals: 
•  Goal 24: Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech; 
•  Goal 25: Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV; 
• Goal 16: Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy”; 
•  Goal 27: Infiltrate the Churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible…; 
•  Goal 40: Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. Each of these goals listed by Mr. Skousen, considered unthinkable in the America of 1958, are not only accomplished in the United States, but are principal components in today’s pop-culture, as purveyed by Hollywood, rock and roll, MTV, Internet and countless other media.5 Now, to take this up to the present: we see the forces of organized naturalism, the force of secularism, and yes, even the forces of the Communist spirit at work in our nation to this day. 

1992: Communist Party USA 
There is a fascinating documentary released a few years back called Grinding America Down by former Idaho Representative Curtis Brown. In the beginning of the documentary, Rep. Brown tells the story of when he was a graduate student in 1992, a writer-acquaintance asked Brown to attend a weekend meeting for him with the Communist Party USA. The meeting was held at Berkeley University. Here, Brown saw the Communists propounding a strategy for further subversion of America from within. 

• To break down the family – the Communists urged promotion of co-habitation (living together out of wedlock) and the Feminist Movement; 
• To destroy our culture and religion –  the Communists encouraged promotion of homosexuality; 
• “To destroy business” – Brown relates, the Communists in 1992 said “they wanted to get behind the environmental movement, as they saw it as the only vehicle capable of creating enough regulation and red tape to discourage business growth.”

Brown said that when he was at this 1992 meeting, he thought to himself: this plan is so radical, I’m probably not going to have to worry about it in my lifetime. But around 2006 or so, he remembered the 1992 event, and was stunned to realize that every goal the Communists had set at that meeting was fulfilled in the United States. In the same documentary, former White House Staff Economic Advisor Jim Simpson noted, “Patrick Moore, who was a co-founder of Green Peace, and he was a very dedicated environmentalist, quit Greenpeace when he realized that it had been captured by radical leftists who were intent on using the environmental movement as a vehicle to destroy capitalism.” This is why many environmentalists have been called Watermelons: green on the outside, red on the inside. 

It is no surprise that Barack Obama pushes, as much as he is able, the environmentalist agenda, as well as homosexuality and feminism. Even more disturbing, however, is that certain members of the present-day Vatican, in their Modernist thrust to allegedly “dialogue” with the world, give the appearance of espousing the same evils promoted by the enemies of Christ. 

Documents emanating from Synod 2014, as well as the prepatory documents for the 2015 Synod,  unbelievable as it sounds, say we should look for ‘positive elements’ of co-habitation.6  The 2014 Synod mid-term document spoke of the ‘positive aspects’ of homosexuality. 7  We see Cardinals speaking of the alleged ‘positive aspects’ of ‘stable’ homosexual relationships. 8  These same men who propound these scandalous proposals maintain their influence of power in the 2015 Synod now underway. 

And sad to say, the push for environmentalism in the present pontificate not only reflects the plan called for by the enemies of Christ and Christian civilization, but also has nothing to do with the competence and duties of the papal office.

 What we have in this case is religion at the service of humanity, religion at the service of ecology. It is a mancentered disorientation caused by a reckless sentimentality, and by the spirit of Modernism. 

We live in the world now dominated by the spirit of Antichrist, as clearly laid out in the documented plans of Freemasonry and Communism. We have become so used to this unprecedented level of corruption, however, many Catholics believe the 1984 Consecration fulfilled the requirements of Our Lady, and we are now, somehow, living through the beginning of the Triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. This is ludicrous, and demonstrates that too many of us have become tone-deaf to the music of Catholic Truth. 

Original The Fatima Crusader | Winter 2015

Thursday, May 11, 2017

Catholic Action League Blasts Sean O'Malley at Obama Award Event, 'Betrayal of Pro-Life Movement'

By Michael W. Chapman | May 9, 2017 | 11:16 AM EDT

( --The Catholic Action League of Massachusetts criticized Boston Cardinal Archbishop Sean O'Malley for attending the 2017 Profile in Courage Award event on Sunday, where former President Barack Obama was honored, stressing that Obama is "the most pro-abortion president" in U.S. history and that O'Malley's presence displayed an "appalling betrayal of the pro-life movement."
In Boston, President Obama received the Profile in Courage Award, which was created in 1989 by the Kennedy family to recognize politicians who demonstrate "politically courageous leadership in the spirit of Profiles in Courage," a 1957 Pulitzer Prize winning book. Although Sen. John F. Kennedy is listed as the author of the book, most of it was ghost written by Ted Sorenson, a Kennedy speechwriter.  
During his remarks at the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum, President Obama acknowledged Cardinal O'Malley's presence. Obama spoke about how support for his Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), which mandates coverage for abortifacients and sterilization, as a profile in courage. 

Cardinal O'Malley's attendance at the event was an "appallin betrayal of the pro-life movement, of the innocent unborn, and of those Catholics and other Christians struggling to defend First Amendment guarantees of religious liberty," said the Catholic Action Leage in a press release. 
C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League, said, "Barack Obama was, by any objective indicator, the most pro-abortion president in the history of this country, at least since abortion became a public issue in the 1960's. He was also, arguably, the president most hostile to the protections found in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights guaranteeing religious freedom."
"Catholic prelates ought to avoid giving scandal, and, at all times, ought to bear witness to the truth," said Doyle. "Sean O'Malley did neither last night."

"The message O'Malley sends by his attendance at this celebration of Barack Obama is that support for the mass killing of pre-born children, and attacks on the conscience rights of Christians, are morally respectable, are no obstacle to public honors, and, implicitly, are no barrier to the votes and campaign contributions of Catholics," said Doyle. 
He continued, "No rational person can reasonably be expected to take seriously Catholic opposition to abortion when the former chairman of the Pro-Life Activities Committee of the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is photographed smiling at an event hailing Planned Parenthood's favorite president."

"Once again, Catholic principles are cast aside, and the whole world can see the fawning servility of the American Catholic hierarchy to wealth, celebrity, and political power," said Doyle.

In its press release, the Catholic Action League noted that in his 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, Obama was endorsed by Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America. In an April 2013 speech, President Obama asked God to bless Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion vendor in the United States. Before leaving office in January 2017, Obama signed an executive order prohibiting states from defunding Planned Parenthood.
The Catholic Action League also noted that as an Illinois state seantor, Obama opposed (and voted against) born alive legisilation, which would have required medical care be given to children who survived an abortion. 
Further, it was the Obama administration that mandated nearly all health insurers to provide coverage for contraception, sterilization, and drugs that can induce an abortion, such as the morning-after pill. 
The use or support of abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception is contrary to Catholic teaching.

"Every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil, according to the Catholic Catechism.  Direct sterilization or contraception are "morally unacceptable," states the Catechism. 

On abortion, the Church teaches,  "Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law: You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish."

Saint Chrysostomos: the way to hell is plastered with the head of bishops.

The Cathedral of St Paul in Boston held a Transgender Day

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Ireland: Homosexualist Archbishop Diarmuid Martin Lure Homosexuals Into Eternal Condemnation.

Practicing homosexuals are encouraged to receive Holy Communion in Dublin, Ireland, during an, “All Are Welcome Mass” at a Carmelite Retreat Centre every 3rd Sunday each month, writes Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin once presided over such a mass.

During such masses the altar is often covered with a rainbow flag. Lay people read the gospel or prayers reserved to the priest. The audience is invited, “to experience full participation when celebrating the Eucharist."

According to the Bible and to Catholic doctrine, practicing homosexuality is a mortal sin. Receiving Communion in such a state is another mortal sin. Mortal sins lead to eternal condemnation in hell.

LGBT Mass is sponsored by Irish clergy with the blessing of Abp. Diarmuid Martin

May 9, 2017 DUBLIN ( - Practicing homosexuals in Ireland are encouraged to receive Holy Communion with the support of clergy and under the purview of the top ranking prelate, Abp. Diarmuid Martin.
Active homosexuals and those advocating an LGBT lifestyle, along with dissident groups opposed to Catholic teaching attend Mass every 3rd Sunday of the month at the Avila Carmelite Retreat Centre in Dublin. The monthly gathering is called the All Are Welcome Mass.

Lesbian "Diego Neria" said: “After seeing the Pope, I left with my head held high I heard Mass and received communion. Read between the lines ...”

According to the CDF Cd. Coccopalmerio is “no longer in full communion with the Catholic Church”

Cardinal Dissolves the Sacrament of Orders

 In a recently published book liberal Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, president of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, claims that the Anglican orders are not invalid, writes The Tablet.

Coccopalmerio contradicts Leo XIII's bull Apostolicae curae (1896), which declares that they are “absolutely null and utterly void”.

Coccopalmerio instead claims: “We have had, and we still have a very rigid understanding of validity and invalidity: this is valid, and that is not valid. One should be able to say: ‘this is valid in a certain context, and that is valid in another context'.” These words imply that the sacrament of ordination has no value in itself, and amount to a denial of this sacrament.


With regard to those truths connected to revelation by historical necessity and which are to be held definitively, but are not able to be declared as divinely revealed, the following examples can be given: the legitimacy of the election of the Supreme Pontiff or of the celebration of an ecumenical council, the canonizations of saints (dogmatic facts), the declaration of Pope Leo XIII in the Apostolic Letter Apostolicae Curae on the invalidity of Anglican ordinations.

15 Whoever denies these truths would be in a position of rejecting a truth of Catholic doctrine16 and would therefore no longer be in full communion with the Catholic Church. 

According to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Bergoglio is no  in full communion with the Catholic Church  for  contradict the declaration of Pope Leo XIII in the Apostolic Letter Apostolicae Curae and openly promotes the heresy of religious indifferentism.

Pope Leo XIII’s 1896 , Apostolicae Curae: Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void”

Pope Leo XIII

  • It breaks away from the Apostolic succession

In the rite of conferring and administering any sacrament one rightly distinguishes between the ceremonial part and the essential part, which is customarily called the matter and form. […] Now, the words which until recent times were everywhere held by the Anglicans as the proper form of priestly ordination, namely, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit,’ certainly do not in the least signify definitely the order of priesthood, or its grace and power, which is especially the power ‘of consecrating and of offering the true Body and Blood of the Lord,’ in that sacrifice which is no ‘nude commemoration of the sacrifice offered on the Cross’ [see n. 950]. Such a form was indeed afterwards lengthened by these words, ‘for the office and work of a priest’; but this rather convinces one that the Anglicans themselves saw that this first form was defective, and not appropriate to the matter. But the same addition, if perchance indeed it could have placed legitimate significance on the form, was introduced too late, since a century had elapsed after the adoption of the Edwardine Ordinal; since, moreover, with the extinction of the hierarchy, there was now no power for ordaining. (Denzinger-Hünermann 3315-3316. Leo XIII, Letter Apostolicae curae – On the Nullity of Anglican Orders, September 13, 1896)